Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
|
Tetem
Today, Conny and I, went to TETEM art space, were we looked at three exhibitions. First we went to see
Size Matters organized together with We Like Art, that shows works by over a hundred artist in only two sizes,
paper size A5
(for € 100 each) and A3 (for € 500 each). We liked the
smaller works most. All the works are sold anonymous. Only after the exhibition
is over the names will be revealed. But often it is easy to recognize which
works are from the same artists. All the works are numbered. We liked the
following:
- 100: photo realistic painting of an old wedding picture. 101 and 103 are
from the same artist, also paintings of old pictures.
- 368 to 370: a set of three works with drawings of what seems to be roots.
- 151: A card with the text: This is my good side.
- 200 and 201: photo realistic portrets of a black man and woman.
Next we went to experience Beacons, which is an installation created by
Mariska de Groot,
Matteo Marangoni, and Dieter Vandoren. It consists of devices that communicate with each other
through signals that also can be sensed by humans. It was interesting to
experience this. Some of the devices sometimes sounded like birds.
Then we watched the short (six minutes) movie Ego Trip by
Anton Benois and Beth Dillon. At last we went back to Size Matters to look at the
small sized works. We both noticed that we saw works that we had not noticed
before. I decided to systematically look at all works and noticed that I had
not 'seen' about one tenth of them. Strange how your eyes skip over certrain
works.
Takuzu
Yesterday afternoon, I solved my first 12 by 12 binary puzzle (better known
as Takuzu. While I was
solving, I was already thinking about the number of different solutions there
exist and about the number of different columns. I searched on the internet,
and I found the sequence A253316 and
discovered that the valuess are only known up to and including 8 to 8. I think
that because of the requirement that no two columns and no two rows may be the
same, it might only be possible to calculate the number by enumerating all the
solutions. I estimate that the number for 10 by 10 must be larger than
10,000,000,000. Even if a program could find a thousand solutions per second,
it would still take more than a hundred days to enumerate them all.
During the evening, while having a dinner with my colleagues, I figured out
the following formuleas for calculating the number of different rows:
C(1,0) = 0, C(2,0) = 2, C(n, 0) = 0 for n > 2, C(0, m) = 0, C(n,m) = 0 for
n < 0 or m < 0, and C(n, m) = C(m, n-1) + C(m, n-2). For a row of length
2n, 2C(n,n) gives the number of different rows (or columns). At home in bed, I
calculated the following table:
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
---+---------------------
1 | 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
2 | 1 2 3 2 1 0 0
3 | 0 2 5 7 6 3 1
4 | 0 1 5 12 17 16
5 | 0 0 3 13 29 42
6 | 0 0 1 9
7 | 0 0 0
This morning, using the underlined numbers, I found the sequences A003440 and A177790 that give the
requested numbers. The sequences are basically the same except for a
multiplication factor of two. I noticed that the formuleas given with A003440
are more complicated than the formuleas that I came up with yesterday. I also
found the related sequence A058527,
which gives a very broad upper bound.
Ongoingness
I finished reading the book Ongoingness: The End
of a Diary by Sarah Manguso, which I started reading last Thursday. In
this short book, Manguso tells about her thoughts and motivations to keep a
diary. It seems that her main motivation was to hold on to her life by trying
to keep her memories of the past, only to discover that it is impossible and
maybe even keeping her from truely living life itself. The book could also be
read as a short autobiography. The past five years, I have been making quite
detailed notes of what I do every day, but not in an attempt to capture my
life, but mostly to experience my life by contemplating about what I do every
day in an attempt to surpress the feeling that things are going faster and
faster. I also keeping another diary, which I only use to write when there are
some emotions that I am struggling with, not in an attempt to record them for
the future, but to put them aside.
Takuzu: 10 by 10
The number of 10 by 10 Takuzu is
48,183,195,384 according to my calculations. Yesterday afternoon, I wrote
the first program to calculate the number for
various sizes. This program used recursion to fill the grid row by row. The
program first creates a tree with all valid sequences for a row (or column),
next it tries to select combinations of these trees for all rows and columns.
Counters in the trees are used to detect equal rows and columns. A value for
a position in the grid is selected if there is a tree available for already
filled in values in the crossing row and column. To my surprise, it found
millions of solutions per second for the 8 by 8 case, which gave me good hope
that the 10 by 10 case would be in reach. In the evening, I wrote non-recursive version. I used Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Studio to
debug this and executed a release version. This version found 808,070.433
solutions per second on average and took 16 hours, 33 minutes, and 47 seconds
to find all solutions. Finally, I worked on a
program that generates a version of the algorithm for a given size with
nested for statements and variables instead of arrays. The final version that
I tried, fills the grid in a diagonal manner starting in one corner of the
grid to the opposite corner. It also tries only zero for the first position,
and multiplying the number of solutions found with two. I compiled it with
g++ (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special) and it found 563,937.167 solutions per
second on average and took 11 hours and 52 minutes to complete. Compiling the
program with Visual Studio results in Fatal Error C1061, compiler limit : blocks nested too deeply.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Conny and I went to
see the movie Star Wars: The Force Awakens at 15:30 today. I already had bought the
tickets on October 19 at 13:20:08 for seats A-11 and A-12 (the best seats I
believe) and I had been counting the days and hours till the screening. I also
avoid seeing any of the trailers, after the very first. I think it is a good,
maybe very good movie. I got wet eyes at some scenes, out of nostalgia, I
guess. I think that the movie had a good balance of action, drama, and humor.
I thought that the acting was great. I could not see where the movie was going,
which made it an exciting ride.
Zwolle
Conny and I went to Zwolle. At the railway
station in Hengelo we saw a rainbow (a picture). In Zwolle we went to Museum de Fundatie to see the other half of the Turner exhibition, of which we saw the first half on November 25. Below a list of works we saw, all by Turner and some others
as well:
- Whitby, 1824
- Whitehall, 1835
- Haarlem from Spaarne, 1820-30
- Stormy sea with blazing wreck, 1835-40
- Kees van Bohemen: Sea shore, 1963
- Eyal Gever: Waterfall,
2014
- Fishermen upon a Lee-shore, in squaly weather, 1802
- Pier Mondriaan: Zee na zondsopgang
- Seascape with distant coast, about 1840
- Constance, 1842
- Torbay from Brizam, 1816-17
- Eyal Gever: Piece of ocean
- Eyal Gever: Nuclear
explosion
- Fire at the grand storehouse of the tower of London, 1841
- The burning of the houses of parliament, 1834-35
- The burning of Rome, 1834-35
- Clouds and water, 1840
- Calais sands at lowe water. Poissands collecting bait
- The prince of Orange, William III, Embarked from Holland, and Landed
at Torbay, November 4th, 1688, after a Stormy Passage
- The Eruption of the Souffrier Mountains, in the Island of St Vincent,
at Midnight, on the 30th of April, 1812
- Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego in the Burning Fiery Furnace
- Sunrise, 1825-30
- The scarlet sunset, 1830-40
- Ruud van de Wint, without title, 1991
- Six of twenty vignettes
- Elise van der Linde: OZON, 2008, video 2 minutes and 6 seconds.
- Hiroyuki Masuyama: JHW Turner, burning houses of parliament
(NR.3-4-5-6-7-8)
- Eyal Gever: Big Smoke, 2012
- Danielle Kwaaitaal: Après nous le déluge -
silence, 2015
- Jan Cremer: Red horizon
- Jan Cremer: Seabastopol sunrise
- Bart van de Leck: Composition 1918 (No.5)
- Barend Cornelis Koekkoek: Landschap met Ruiters en vee, 1840
- Exhibition of pictures by Ellen Auerbach
- Ellen Auerbach: Ohne Titel (Big sur, Kalifornia), 1950
- Ellen Auerbach: Willem de Kooning, 1944
- Exhibition of pictures by Barbara Klemm
Next we visited bookstore Waanders In de Broeren, which is situated in
a former church. We looked around and watched an exhibition of
Ton Schulten. We
also visited bookstore Boekenhuis Zwolle. Finally, we visited the
ice sculpture fesitval behind the railway station. (The route we walked in
Zwolle can be viewed in Google Earth:
KML file or
in Google Maps.)
On the way back in the train, the sun was low at the horizon, just like it
was on the way to Zwolle. I took two pictures: one sharp and one blured.
Book
At 13:18, I bought the book Na de beeldenstorm. Drie opstellen over recente
beeldende kunst by Carel Blotkamp from thrift store Het Goed for € 1.50. I did not know of this book.
It contains two reproductions of works by Peter
Struycken. Illustration 8 is Komputerstrukturen 4a rotated by 180 degrees and Illustration 7 is
Wetmatige beweging
rood-geel/blauw-wit.
I found some new solutions for two 8 by 10 Chinese Wooden Puzzle. Today, I aborted two progams running for about a
month. When I analyzed the results, it looked like both had found all possible
solutions, because for all solutions were found in multiples of four. I found
new number of solutions for White, orange, yellow,
and blue (2978 instead of 2857) and for White,
orange, red, and blue (550 instead of 542). Because the program (from
November 18, 2015) appears to take much
longer than the older program, which contained a bug, I decided to work on a
reimplementation of the older program. Just yesterday evening, I succeeded in
making that program to return the same
results for all possible puzzles with size 1 by 10 to 6 by 10. The last bug
that I removed from that program, might also have been the bug that made the
older program return fewer solutions. I plan to verify this and then try to
determine the fastest algorithm.
Chinese Wooden Puzzle
The last days, I completed recalculating the 8 by 10 Chinese Wooden Puzzles. It turned out that the last algorithm was by far
the fastest, so I let it run on the open problems and verified the results,
when possible with the results from the correct but slow algorithm. This
allowed me to correct or verify the solutions for:
- White, orange, yellow, and green
- White, orange, yellow, and black
- White, orange, red, and black
- White, orange, blue, and green
- White, orange, blue, and black
- White, orange, green, and black
Wintergo
Today, I went to Wintergo, a rather relaxed Go
tournament for a single day. I was just in time to enlist for the round of the
day. I played a very interesting and exciting game, which I won, but could
easily have lost if I would have made a mistake. The end position is displayed
on the right. game record.
I also brought my wooden Chinese Wooden Puzzle and showed it to some people.
Elske and Sander found three and one new solutions.
In the afternoon, I went to look at the ruins of the St. Walrick chapel with
Clootie tree and
walked around the fens of Haterse and Overasselt. I took some pictures,
one of a dead tree in the water.
(The route in Google Earth: KML file or in Google Maps.) On the way home, I listened to
Armin Van Buuren - Mix Marathon XXL (on
SoundCloud).
Kind of Minds
This evening, I finished reading the book Kind
of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness by
Daniel C. Dennett,
which I started reading on October 20, four days after I bought it on
October 16. It is a rather philisophical book with
asks some good questions, but I find the part about the difference between
human and animal minds (of apes and other mammals) not very convincing,
especially because it gives language abilities a central role, stating that
language is the the vehicle for conceptual thinking. Being a visual spacial
thinker, I often struggle for finding the right words and expressions to
express my thought, from which I conclude that concepts are more fundamental
than words and expressions. I know that I can perform a lot of thinking without
using words, and it seems that the conscious experience, awareness, is not
bound to the use of language. The book states many good question, but does only
answers a few, as the book also concludes at the end.
This months interesting links
Home
| November 2015
| January 2016